Here are our Forex MegaDroid backtest results for May. The distinction may not be obvious, and may even seem irrelevant, but nonetheless although these are backtest results, the data used for the backtest was acquired on a demo account moving forward in time and not from a downloaded MetaTrader history. This test was performed using exactly the same input settings as in our MegaDroid Backtest Results for April.
Filed under Trading Systems by 
As you know, I was idly perusing the Boston Technologies website the other day when I happened across their very own MetaTrader robot, which seems to have developed an unfortunate habit of losing money rather than making it hand over fist.
Filed under Brokers by
I telephoned FXCM again about my latest problem with an expert advisor that was unable to place any orders. I eventually managed to speak to a very helpful lady with an American accent who is a MetaTrader specialist in their sales department. She'd obviously been asked this question before, and here is my understanding of her explanation.
Filed under Trading Systems by
Whilst browsing around the Boston Technologies website idly looking for a technical support number to call I noticed that they were offering a "free, very promising, MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor".
I know that there's no such thing as a free lunch, but in all the circumstances I couldn't resist the temptation to download it and do some backtesting. The first thing I noticed was that unlike us here at the Trading Gurus they don't supply the source code for their EA, only the executable version. That means you have to take their word for it when they explain that:
Filed under Trading Systems by
I still haven't heard back from FXCM and/or Boston Technologies about the problems I'd been having getting one of our more complicated expert advisors working on their MetaTrader platform. I figured I'd try a very basic one instead. I fired up our second example robot, which enters the market at random with a fixed stop loss and profit target, and uses a Martingale style money management system. Or maybe that should be mismanagement? I digress!
Filed under Brokers by
The FXCM Limited MetaTrader banner promises:
No Dealing Desk Execution
Hedging Capabilities through FSA Regulated Entity
Spreads as Low as 1 Pip EUR/USD
Accept ALL MT4 Expert Advisors
The Trading Gurus are based in South West England, so we're not too unhappy about the idea of opening a live account with an FSA regulated forex broker based in the UK. Those bullet points sound exactly like the sort of brokerage account we've been waiting for, so I opened a demo account with FXCM UK, and fired up one of our Expert Advisors.
Filed under Brokers by
As zero hour approaches FXCM are taking a different approach to the NFA ban on hedging. If you go to their website today, and wait for a while the banner will change to promote their new UK based website.
Filed under Brokers by
In an announcement on their website forex broker FXDD say that:
In our effort to provide the best solution for your trading regarding the NFA’s new rule on hedging, please know that we have been in contact with the NFA and have offered several solutions which we believe will accommodate almost all types of trading strategies and comply with the NFA rules. Our discussions with the NFA are ongoing and we will keep you advised. In the mean time, know that FXDD is making no immediate changes to any platforms and that you will be fully advised prior to any proposed changes.
In the Frequently Asked Questions section on their website FXDD still say that:
Filed under Regulation by
As we suggested it seems as though some forex brokers have complained to the NFA that they cannot implement the programming changes necessary in time for the original deadline of May 15th for the now notorious compliance rule 2-43(b). In their new notice I-09-12 the NFA say that:
Filed under Regulation by
Somewhat later than anticipated after my recent trials and tribulations, here are our Forex MegaDroid backtest results for April. This test was performed using version 1.11 of the robot, since the original version now refuses to run backtests. This test used the default input settings, with the following exceptions, mainly required because the test used Alpari UK as the MetaTrader broker, and they support micro-lots and 5 decimal places.
Filed under Trading Systems by
